BANGKOK (AP) 鈥� A court in Thailand on Wednesday ordered the dissolution of the progressive Move Forward Party, which finished first in last year's general election, saying it violated the constitution by proposing an amendment of a law against defaming the country鈥檚 royal family.
The Constitutional Court said it voted unanimously to dissolve the party because its campaign to amend the law was considered an attempt to overthrow the nation's constitutional monarchy.
The Move Forward Party was unable to form a government after topping the polls because members of the Senate, at that time a conservative military-appointed body, refused to endorse its candidate for prime minister.
The Election Commission had filed a petition against the Move Forward Party after in January that it must stop advocating changes to the law, known as Article 112, which protects the monarchy from criticism with penalties of up to 15 years in jail per offense.
The ruling Wednesday also imposed a 10-year ban on political activity for those who held the party鈥檚 executive positions while it campaigned for the proposed amendment. Among them are its charismatic former leader, and current chief Chaithawat Tulathon.
It remained unclear what will happen to the rest of its non-executive lawmakers, although that the party will ensure they have a 鈥渟mooth transition into a new house,鈥� or a new party.
Lawmakers of a dissolved political party can keep their seats in Parliament if they move to a new party within 60 days.
Move Forward and its reform agenda shook up Thai politics by winning the most seats in the 2023 elections even though it was then blocked from taking power. The latest legal action is one of many that have drawn widespread criticism and are seen as part of a yearslong attack on the country鈥檚 progressive movement by conservative forces trying to keep their grip on power.
The party was denied power after the Senate refused to accept its then-leader Pita鈥檚 nomination as prime minister. Senators, who were given power to veto prime ministerial candidates by the constitution adopted in 2017 under a military government, said they opposed Pita because of his intention to reform the royal defamation law. Move Forward was later removed from a coalition formed with the now-governing Pheu Thai party and became head of the opposition.
In its arguments submitted to the court, Move Forward said the Constitutional Court does not have jurisdiction to rule on the case and the petition filed by the Election Commission did not follow due process because Move Forward was not given an opportunity to defend itself before it was submitted to the court. The court said in its ruling that it has the authority to decide the case, and that its previous ruling in January was sufficient evidence for the Election Commission to file the case without having to hear more evidence from the party.
Human rights organizations and other advocacy groups expressed concern about the court's ruling.
"The decision is not a surprise, and is unlikely to spur large-scale protests given that Move Forward MPs will remain a force in Parliament, albeit under a different banner," Matthew Wheeler, a regional analyst for the Brussels-based Crisis Group, said in an email. "But the decision is a further illustration that the 2017 constitution, drafted at the behest of coupmakers and approved in a flawed referendum, was designed to curb the popular will rather than facilitate its expression. It shows that Thailand is still a long way from achieving a consensus on the appropriate sources of political legitimacy, with the establishment digging in its heels against the will of the electorate.鈥�
Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin has maintained that the Thai justice system is fair and impartial, and that the government cannot interfere with the judicial process.
Move Forward鈥檚 predecessor, the Future Forward party, was dissolved by the Constitutional Court in 2020 on charges of violating election laws on donations to political parties.
Thailand鈥檚 courts, especially the Constitutional Court, are considered a bulwark of the country鈥檚 royalist establishment, which has used them and nominally independent state agencies such as the Election Commission to issue rulings to cripple or sink political opponents.
The dissolution of Future Forward, whose promises of reforms were particularly attractive for younger people disillusioned after years of military rule, further highlighted the struggle between the progressive movement and conservative forces. It was one of the triggers for youth-led pro-democracy protests that sprang up across the country in 2020. The protests openly criticized the monarchy, an institution previously considered untouchable and a linchpin of Thai society.
The protests led to vigorous prosecutions under Article 112, which previously had been relatively rarely employed. Critics say the law is often wielded as a tool to quash political dissent.
Move Forward, formed as a new home for lawmakers from the dissolved Future Forward party, campaigned for an amendment of the article and other democratic reforms in the 2023 elections. It won first place in the balloting, a surprise victory indicating that many Thai voters were ready for change.
Move Forward has insisted that it wants to keep the monarchy above politics and not be exploited as a political tool.
Jintamas Saksornchai, The Associated Press
