鶹Ƶ

Skip to content

Seeing things differently...

A Common Sense Compromise By Lynne Bell One dictionary definition of “common sense” is “good sense and judgement in practical matters.

A Common Sense Compromise

By Lynne Bell

One dictionary definition of “common sense” is “good sense and judgement in practical matters. And a recent comment by CUPE (Canadian Union of Public Employees) health council chair, Gordon Campbell, demonstrated just that.

Campbell was speaking to The Regina Leader Post's Will Chabun regarding how much information-if any-should be displayed by health care employees on their name tags.

Campbell stated that first names only were sufficient, because “names are a comfort to people who are receiving care-knowing whether it's Gord or Sally or whoever provides the care.” He also said that name tags help co-workers on varying shifts develop “a valuable rapport with each other.”

This issue arose in response to a policy (which has since been changed) that had been proposed by the North Battleford-based Prairie Health region, which recommended that front-line health care workers wear name tags which displayed both their first and last names.

The health region's VP of People, Strategy and Performance, Irene Denis, told Chabun that the policy was well-intentioned, stemming from the province's 'Patient First' policy and was meant to aid in “addressing the 'imbalance of power' between patient and caregiver.”

But however well-intentioned the initiative was, both the Prairie Health Region and CUPE should be commended for reaching a reasonable response which addressed the needs of both employees and the patients they care for.

Although the health region stated-in its defence-that police officers, corrections workers and social workers wear full name tags, their professional situations differ greatly from those of front-line health care workers. Police, corrections workers, and even social workers are well-trained to manage (and are perhaps even expecting) the possible risks of dealing with those they may encounter during the course of their work day.

However, even though health care workers are medical professionals-and may even specialize in mental health issues-they should not have to cope with: receiving threatening phone calls at home, or dealing with Facebook friend requests from patients, or even finding a convicted sex offender outside their residence. All of these unsettling occurences were actually experienced by health care workers in this province, and at the very least, they are unsettling distractions and at worst, incidents that could negatively impact an employee's peace of mind and worse, personal safety.

For the majority of patients who are not a threat of any kind, but who are, in many cases, alone, afraid, and vulnerable in a hospital bed, knowing a caregiver's first name gives them a modicum of protection (in case they do need to make a report), as well as a sense of comfort and control, at a time when they may have little of either.

Campbell's statement on behalf of CUPE is a common sense compromise that addresses the concerns of both patients and those who care for them.

Do they really need a name tag?

By Kelly Running

When working with the public many people wear name tags, some will have their first names only on them while others have both their first and last names displayed.

Recently the Saskatchewan labour board ruled that putting someone’s first name and surname on their name tag meant that employee’s privacy and safety was at risk. Therefore a change has been made to only include the individual’s first name.

But, should they have their name on it at all? Many people feel that it’s important for healthcare workers to have a name tag. When first meeting someone if they’re wearing a name tag you often feel more comfortable with them, because you know their name, they’re not just some random person.

If issues arose or if the patient wanted to compliment the healthcare worker then a name tag quickly identifies who the healthcare worker is in that situation.

The healthcare worker knows the name of the patient, so why shouldn’t the patient or the patient’s family know who their healthcare worker is without having to get them to introduce themselves.

The change was enacted due to complaints by healthcare workers, which included one rather concerning story that I’ve read about. The story involved a healthcare worker who had been working while a 93-year-old patient passed away. The son of the patient, looked to the healthcare workers name tag, repeating her first and last name before accusing the healthcare worker of killing his mother. Apparently a few days later the employee’s roommate called to say that a suspicious man was sitting in his car outside of their house.

However, should they have to wear a tag at all?

Healthcare workers have a lot to do in a day and while they’re doing it, should they have to worry about a name tag hanging off of their scrubs? It must get in the way in some form I would think while helping patients and could be an annoying thing to keep up with as a healthcare worker.

Also, most people don’t really look for the name tag typically asking an individual’s name instead, even if they’re wearing a name tag. Additionally many people who work as healthcare professionals work with older individuals who are often unable to read the name tags.

Oftentimes if people are looking for a name tag it’s because they either want to give a compliment or make a complaint to the higher ups. Both of which are easy enough to do by simply asking the person their name.

So, is it really practical for someone working in healthcare to really be wearing a name tag?

Eliminating the use of their last name is good in case of such happenings as the aforementioned story, but do they even need a name tag at all?

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks