The other week we ran a story about wild boar in the southeastern area of Saskatchewan, about an ongoing study trying to track and determine the boars’ habits. I follow the, Wild Hog Watch (Feral Wild Boars), Facebook page, which is updated by someone involved with the study in the area and was surprised that after they shared our story, and really any story, about boars a slew of comments flood the comment sections asking for information on where they are.
The comments on one post included, “Tell me where to go and I’ll come shoot some.” “My freezer needs one.” “Ask and organize the local hunters to come and harvest pigs for the freezer. I’m sure you’ll get an overwhelming response.”
On a different article shared on Facebook the comments continued in this fashion, one stating that in their opinion the study was a waste of money. Why? Well because there’s been studies done in the United States and Australia.
Now why was I surprised by all these comments? Because the articles clearly state that they are collaring pigs and tracking them, determining their habits north of the 49th parallel. Studies have been done in the States, but Saskatchewan has different terrain and a completely different climate than anywhere else. The study I read from Queensland, Australia states that control methods used on boar vary depending on the location area they are dealing with, which reinforces my view of the importance of a study in Saskatchewan as our topology and climate is vastly different than Queensland’s.
The studies being conducted here are an important piece of the puzzle as they need to monitor and study the animals, because they are exceptionally adaptive to their surroundings.
Boar are extremely intelligent and when hunted by inexperienced people it exacerbates the problems. The boar adapt and become more difficult to locate – they, like any wild animal, avoid humans – the more they are hunted by people thinking that killing one or two is helpful the more issues develop. These people are misinformed, and make me feel like they didn’t even read the articles, as killing a couple boar, which can have two batches of six to 10 babies in a year, is meaningless when we look at the whole picture.
Well, that is, other than educating the boar on how to become more evasive. They don’t like people and will find ways to avoid them; therefore, people are being counterproductive and ultimately hindering the attempts to study the boar and the want of those conducting the study to create a viable eradication plan in Saskatchewan.
By coming into an area where a study is being conducted and deciding that you’re going to shoot a boar, what happens when that’s one of the collared hogs? All of a sudden all of the work that those conducting the study have put into it – trapping that particular hog, collaring it, and tracking it for information to eventually help the eradication effort – goes down the drain and they have to start again.
Yes, boar are a problem. But, why don’t we support the studies in figuring out a game plan to eradicate them instead of essentially working against them. At the end of the day everyone wants the same thing, to eradicate the wild boar, so let those conducting the study in the area do so in peace.
If this study is going to help in the long run, why be the one to interfere with it?