Julie Payette must feel like she won the lottery.
Despite resigning in shame from her posting as governor general amidst of creating a toxic workplace, she is still entitled to the Cadillac of all retirement packages, courtesy of all of us taxpayers.
First off, there’s the pension. At per year, it’s generous enough to put any former governor general amongst the top of income earners in the country. And that’s not accounting for any other income they might get from any other work or investment they may have.
It’s not like governors general have to work long and hard to be eligible for it either. A governor general’s mandate is typically five years. Payette served for a bit more than three and she still gets a full pension.
That’s because the very second a governor general steps down, they become eligible for the full per year taxpayer-funded pension, no matter how long they stay in office. Even if they resign within their first day on the job, they get the total amount in perpetuity.
Even by government standards, this is rich. A federal bureaucrat earning per year – the same level as a governor general – would have to wait to get a similar pension. And unlike governors general, they have to contribute to their pension funds.
Then, there’s the expense accounts. Even in their retirement, governors general can keep billing taxpayers up to per year each for travel, hotel and a private office.
And as if a lifetime expense account wasn’t enough, obtained by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation show a governor general’s estate can keep submitting receipts for up to six months after their death.
And they do so with little transparency. The only reason Canadians found out about the policy is because former governor general Adrienne Clarkson spent over some years, which required its very own line in the public accounts. Since leaving office in 2004, Clarkson has asked us to cover more than in expenses.
Canadians are understandably outraged by this policy. A recent Léger poll commissioned by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation shows nearly Canadians want the policy scrapped.
Even federal bureaucrats found it a bit rich. A prepared for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in October 2019 recommended the entitlements “end after a defined number of years of leaving office rather than the current for-life regime.”
What has Trudeau done with those recommendations in the last two years? Nothing. They have been gathering dust somewhere in the Prime Minister’s Office.
Let’s be clear; it’s not like changing this policy would require extensive debates or weeks of hard work by highly paid policy advisors.
Post-retirement expense accounts for governors general are not enshrined in law. They’re an administrative policy that stems from a decision in 1979.
As such, getting rid of it doesn’t involve lengthy debates and readings in Parliament but rather a quick decision from government ministers to scrap it. It shouldn’t take much more than two minutes in the next cabinet meeting.
The fact is, when the country is dealing with a deficit, our government should do its utmost to identify places where it can save money.
Reining in the entitlements we give to former governors general should be one of those easy decisions. We know it’s popular – eight in 10 Canadians want it. We know the bureaucrats that looked into it find it to be out of whack. It also happens to be something Trudeau promised to review back in .
The only thing we’re left wondering is what’s the holdup in cabinet?
Renaud Brossard is the Quebec Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.
©
