Â鶹ÊÓƵ

Skip to content

Opinion: Solidarity key to school cellphone bans

School administrators and parents need to support teachers.
teenager-cellphone
Students are significantly less likely to be distracted during lessons in schools where phones are banned.

As students return to class across the country, they will be confronting a new reality at school.

One of the primary reasons for these restrictions is increased recognition that phones are and .

What prompted this wave of change during the past year was a crescendo of warnings about the negative impacts of phone and social media use. In 2023, the on the negative effects of social media use on youth mental health. A called attention to the negative impact phones are having on student learning and called for greater restrictions on their use.

Regardless of the approach taken to restrict phones, it’s the implementation of the policy that’s going to determine whether any of this makes a difference.

Reasons for restrictions

The most recent results of study showed that in Canada and many developed countries, scores in math, reading and science have steadily declined over the last decade due in large part to “technology used for leisure rather than instruction, such as mobile phones.”

In addition, the largest school districts in the country due to the impact that social media use is having on student learning and mental health.

have found . indicates that in schools around the world where cellphones are banned, students are significantly less likely to be distracted during lessons.

found schools that implemented phone bans experienced a subsequent increase in learning among girls and a decrease in incidents of bullying among all students. found schools that implemented phone bans showed increases in student test scores driven by improved performance among the lowest-achieving students.

, where mobile phones were banned in 2015, found that within three years, incidents of bullying had decreased between 10 per cent to 18 per cent. Researchers compared learning growth in one of the regions that implemented the ban compared to the other regions that did not, and found that where the ban existed there were academic gains equivalent to between about a half to one year of learning in math and science.

Different approaches to restrictions

The specific approach taken to regulate phone use is going to differ across the country.

Provinces and have announced bans during class time for all grades. By contrast, and have announced a tiered approach, whereby students in lower grades are not allowed to access phones at all during the school day, but older students are permitted access in between classes.

And yet others like and are giving school districts greater flexibility to craft their own policies, as long as they align with provincial guidelines.

Easy to announce policy, hard to change practices

While it’s easy for governments to make big policy announcements, it’s much more difficult to change what happens in the thousands of schools across the country.

It’s worth remembering that this is not our first attempt in Canada to ban phones in schools. In 2007, that banned phones from schools. Similar to many of the current policies, phones were to be powered off and out of view, unless explicitly authorized by the school principal.

While educators felt that the restrictions improved the academic and social climate in schools, that in the face of resistant students, the restrictions were inconsistently applied. Due to a lack of support among parents and students, and a corresponding lack of appetite for enforcement among teachers and administrators, the cellphone ban was dropped within four years.

In 2019, Ontario announced a ban on cellphones in schools that proved to be mostly symbolic. Just as it was with the TDSB in 2007, the reason the ban was ineffective was that it was inconsistently applied and not taken seriously. As the head of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation , “there often seems to be little support or enforcement from administrators.”

Must engage teachers, parents

In order to be effective this time around, school districts and schools need to proactively engage all education stakeholders. Teachers have legitimate concerns about enforcement, from students and parents.

It simply cannot be left up to individual teachers to enforce these restrictions on their own without significant support from school administrators. Work also needs to be done to bring parents on board since they’re the ones who are purchasing these devices and allowing their kids to come to school with them.)

Parents need to be shown that phone use is harming their child’s ability to learn, .

Clearly communicate expectations

Once outreach has occurred, expectations need to be clearly communicated to students and parents, and restrictions need to be consistently applied by teachers and school administrators. Furthermore, schools need to ensure that there are robust extracurricular and for students throughout the school day in order to provide a compelling real-life alternative to all of the socializing that was previously taking place online.

The announcement of school cellphone bans across the country has provided an important opportunity to turn the tide against the negative effects of what .”

But announcements are not enough. Creating environments that allow our children to thrive academically, socially and emotionally will require teachers, school administrators and parents to come together and do the hard work of changing school culture.The Conversation

, Assistant Professor of Educational Leadership, Policy and Program Evaluation, Faculty of Education,

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks